|
Rutgers University - Center for Race & Ethnicity, 191 College Ave. February 15, 2008 Volume 1 Issue 6 |
Center for Race and Ethnicity The Photograph That Shocked America: Race & Photography in American Culture |
|
|
This event was featured in the Center for Race & Ethnicity's recent bulletin (Volume 1 Issue 6, February 15, 2008). Click here to download. IN THIS ISSUE: The Deviant Lie of a Snapshot Gives Us Pause Capturing Everyday Histories
“The complex intersection of the relationship between race, ethnicity, images of the flag and history are found in Masur’s book.” – Keith Wailoo
|
This lecture and panel discussion explored the complex intersections among race, national history, and visual culture. (February 15, 2008, held at Alexander Library, College Ave. Campus) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Panelists: Louis Masur (American Studies, Trinity College); Cheryl Wall (English); Tanya Sheehan (Art History); Keith Wailoo (History, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research) | ||
|
THE AMERICAN FLAG AS A WEAPON The springboard for the discussion was Louis Masur’s forthcoming book The Soiling of Old Glory, which follows the story of a single photograph: Stanley Forman’s 1976 Pulitzer Award wining photograph of Joseph Rakes, a White anti-busing youth, assaulting Ted Landsmark, a Black activist and lawyer, with the American flag in Boston’s City Plaza. THE DEVIANT LIE OF A SNAPSHOT GIVES US PAUSE SEEING IN BLACK AND WHITE Historian of visual culture and Assistant Professor of Art History, Tanya Sheehan, raised “critical questions about blackness, whiteness, and the photographic medium” by observing the racial applications and implications of photography in the U.S. since the medium’s invention in 1839. Sheehan reframed “The Soiling of Old Glory” by comparing it to a variety of photographs, from early slave daguerreotypes to images of Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential campaign. Observing the similarities between Forman’s picture and early-twentieth-century lynching photographs, for instance, Sheehan asked how Forman himself and the mainstream media that disseminated his picture were implicated in the racial violence it documents: “Do we not find something disturbing about the fact that the ‘perfect shot’ for Forman, the one that would earn him the most coveted prize in photojournalism, is the one that captured the palpable threat of white brutality against a black body? Why is this moment – the second before a sacred symbol of American identity and culture would seem to penetrate the body of a prostrate black man – why is this the one that won Forman his prize? CAPTURING EVERYDAY HISTORIES Keith Wailoo rounded out the discussion by noting the way photography depicts racial codes that are both seen and unseen. In his research for his book on race and sickle cell anemia, he came across a photo of a Memphis mayor holding open the door at a new segregated hospital for the city’s middle class Black residents. An otherwise unexceptional, staged publicity shot, this photo sparked controversy among the Memphis White population who were building a backlash against racial accommodation. An image such as this illustrates the way in which everyday gestures can carry powerful reminders of racial tensions, as with recent photographs of those stranded during Hurricane Katrina. “Photographs can capture powerful racial
images and symbols – leading to the racial tensions found here in
America” – Keith Wailoo As this rich discussion demonstrated, visual literacy – learning how to read a text – is crucial for challenging what Masur identified as the “sense of objectivity ascribed to a photograph.” Thinking about images in context, as manipulated and circulated texts, reveals them to be framed by history, even as they seek to document it. |
||